PDA

View Full Version : Some blower thoughts, mainly 2V, but still food for thought.


MTCFORUM
02-13-2002, 09:11 PM
I always throw out alot of thoughts that are going through my mind to bounch off some technical people. I'l try to share those here.

This post started from me working on a blown 2V GT. My friend built the motor and I do all the tuning on it. It's a '96 GT with a 2V with the newer heads and cam, forged pistons good rods, a Vortech with the Vortech aftercooler. With 13# of boost it made 400 RWHP (it's an automatic). We just turned the boost up to 17 PSI and it still makes 400 RWHP. It makes more torque up to about the mid 4000 rpm range, but no more peak HP.

Now that you are up to speed, he's my post from that board.Well, after talking to a few people, and a few experts, here is the theory.

The intake valve is open and the blower is stuffing in boost. You have valve spring pressure trying to close the valve and boost pressure trying to keep the valve open by pushing on the back side of valve. So you now have a balance between valve spring and boost. If the boost is high enough and the valve spring seat pressure low enough, you can blow the valve off the seat. Now, on a stock 2V there is like 60# of seat pressure so if you are running boost over 20 psi, you could blow the intake valves off the seat and lose power. I don't think that this is a problem with any of our cars.

But, when the valve is closing, before it's on it's seat, you have that balance of spring pressure vrs boost. You can slow down the closing of the valve right before it gets to it's seat. This will cause some loss of cylinder pressure as the piston is starting to move back up the cylinder and blowing past the intake valve.

Based on a quick model simulation that I had a friend run, the intake valve closing starts to slow down as low as 9# of boost, varying based on valve spring loads, rates, valve size variance, etc. If everything is nominal, the intake valve is slowing down a noticeable amount to cause power loss by 13#. So, the moral of the story is, you need better springs. The stock springs are basically junk and have a huge tolerance.

KD, could this be why, although the boost is a little high, you couldn't get past that magical 350ish RWHP range? Have you also noticed that some 4.6's with blowers make good power and some only make in the 350 range with all the same stuff?

One more thing to think about.


KD is a good friend, Kris Danner whose blown up about as many 2V motors as Dennis has 4V's. The last one you could see in one side the block and out the other side.

jerry

MTCFORUM
02-13-2002, 09:12 PM
very good stuff! Thank you for sharing it with us!!! Do you think spring rates would be an issue on super coupes as well?

Also, is it possible to use a diffrent cam to help compensate for that?

Kris Danner has one of the fastest V8 tbirds around. It may be the fastest one over at TCCoA if you exclude the use of NOS.
Before he supercharged his car he was running high 13's N/A. Funny think is that Kris's tbird looks stock from the outside, and you'd never know by looking at it that it was capable of low 12's, maybe high 11's. Great guy to talk to too, he cracks me up!

Jason Skewark has a sweet tbird. Cool looking, supercharged, and aftercooled <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://images.zeroforum.com/smile/emsmile.gif" BORDER="0">
here's what JS's car looks like

MTCFORUM
02-13-2002, 09:13 PM
It's an issue with any blown car. But since the SC is blown from the factory, this has been taken into account I'm sure.

jerry

MTCFORUM
03-28-2002, 04:58 AM
This problem was encountered and discussed on the Incon mailing list. What a few people saw was a flattening of the power curve in the upper RPM range. The typical owner was using an aftermarket cam and heads. If you looked at the dyno graph, power would increase uniformly and then basically flat line, not fall off. The conclusion we came to was the intake valve basically began to float. So you basically have to look at valve spring tension, manifold pressure and the lobe profile.

Mitch

MTCFORUM
04-05-2002, 06:26 PM
What about the incoming air speed and the inertial bump you might get with the valve closing against this flow? Resonance effects (standing waves) in the intake plumbing might make this much worse.

I'd want to put a pressure sensor with good high-frequency response right at the manifold side of the port and look at the pressure waveform. Might see some interesting effects.<BR><BR>
[Modified by bill_s, 2:33 AM 4/6/2002]

MTCFORUM
04-08-2002, 07:53 AM
Speaking from a strictly audio standpoint, the effects of standing waves can be tremendously destructive. That's why some of the best new turntables use a triangle for a base now. You can't create standing waves without parallel surfaces for reflection.

I really don't see an issue with this in the intake. I haven't looked at the intake runners or heads closely enough on our cars to know for sure, but I doubt that parallel walls are available for a standing wave to form. Other problems may arrise from the wave forms created, such as increased turbulance and increased air charge temps, but I wouldn't worry too much about standing waves.

Paul